<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Web 2.0 Actually Was</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/what-web-20-actually-was/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/what-web-20-actually-was/</link>
	<description>Warning: Geek Inside!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:14:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aditya</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/what-web-20-actually-was/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/archives/63#comment-340</guid>
		<description>&lt;p id=&quot;p:0&quot;&gt;&lt;i REL=&quot;cquote&quot;&gt;&#8220;I would only have to say that by the rate of TechCrunch posts, Web2.0 is not fading much... ;)&#8221;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Actually, if you remember the Techcrunch posts for the past month or so, you&#039;ll realise that they haven&#039;t been so much about startups, as they have been about news on the web.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Arrington also went through a phase of severe Google bashing which people (including me) pointed out to him in his comments.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;ll be stupid to say that new companies won&#039;t come up, but to name every new company a Web 2.0 company will be equally stupid! :P&lt;span class=&quot;p_ref&quot;&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Reference to this paragraph&quot; href=&quot;#p:0&quot;&gt;&#x2318;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p:0"><i REL="cquote">&ldquo;I would only have to say that by the rate of TechCrunch posts, Web2.0 is not fading much&#8230; ;)&rdquo;</i>&lt;br/>&lt;br/>Actually, if you remember the Techcrunch posts for the past month or so, you&#8217;ll realise that they haven&#8217;t been so much about startups, as they have been about news on the web.&lt;br/>&lt;br/>Arrington also went through a phase of severe Google bashing which people (including me) pointed out to him in his comments.&lt;br/>&lt;br/>It&#8217;ll be stupid to say that new companies won&#8217;t come up, but to name every new company a Web 2.0 company will be equally stupid! :P<span class="p_ref"><a title="Reference to this paragraph" href="#p:0">&#x2318;</a></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singpolyma</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/what-web-20-actually-was/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Singpolyma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/archives/63#comment-335</guid>
		<description>&lt;p id=&quot;p:0&quot;&gt;I would only have to say that by the rate of TechCrunch posts, Web2.0 is not fading much... ;)&lt;span class=&quot;p_ref&quot;&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Reference to this paragraph&quot; href=&quot;#p:0&quot;&gt;&#x2318;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p:0">I would only have to say that by the rate of TechCrunch posts, Web2.0 is not fading much&#8230; ;)<span class="p_ref"><a title="Reference to this paragraph" href="#p:0">&#x2318;</a></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/what-web-20-actually-was/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/archives/63#comment-334</guid>
		<description>&lt;p id=&quot;p:0&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;It also allowed a refreshing workaround to cross-domain AJAX calls&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I remember those days when I used to rack my brains why my AJAX calls were not working. Blogger hadn&#039;t yet started giving the label feeds in the way they are given now. Phydeaux3 had a tipoff about a way to access the RSS label feed from beta.blogger.com.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I didn&#039;t know that AJAX didn&#039;t allow cross-domain communication at that time, and I was on the verge of tearing my hair. :D&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I finally got that info from some Google Group. ;)&lt;span class=&quot;p_ref&quot;&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Reference to this paragraph&quot; href=&quot;#p:0&quot;&gt;&#x2318;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p:0"><i>It also allowed a refreshing workaround to cross-domain AJAX calls&lt;br/></i>&lt;br/>&lt;br/>I remember those days when I used to rack my brains why my AJAX calls were not working. Blogger hadn&#8217;t yet started giving the label feeds in the way they are given now. Phydeaux3 had a tipoff about a way to access the RSS label feed from beta.blogger.com.&lt;br/>&lt;br/>I didn&#8217;t know that AJAX didn&#8217;t allow cross-domain communication at that time, and I was on the verge of tearing my hair. :D&lt;br/>&lt;br/>I finally got that info from some Google Group. ;)<span class="p_ref"><a title="Reference to this paragraph" href="#p:0">&#x2318;</a></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
