<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Whole &#8216;Online Office&#8217; Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/the-whole-online-office-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/the-whole-online-office-thing/</link>
	<description>Warning: Geek Inside!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:14:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Avatar</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/the-whole-online-office-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/archives/117#comment-518</guid>
		<description>&lt;p id=&quot;p:0&quot;&gt;yes, 2010 should be more than enough for when we start seeing this going truly mainstream and working well.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;On Sabeer, yeah, he want to make lightning strike a second time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;lets see what happens.&lt;span class=&quot;p_ref&quot;&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Reference to this paragraph&quot; href=&quot;#p:0&quot;&gt;&#x2318;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p:0">yes, 2010 should be more than enough for when we start seeing this going truly mainstream and working well.&lt;br/>&lt;br/>On Sabeer, yeah, he want to make lightning strike a second time.&lt;br/>&lt;br/>lets see what happens.<span class="p_ref"><a title="Reference to this paragraph" href="#p:0">&#x2318;</a></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditya</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/the-whole-online-office-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/archives/117#comment-501</guid>
		<description>&lt;p id=&quot;p:0&quot;&gt;2010? That&#039;s being &#039;very&#039; optimistic! You really think any of those five points (except for 1 and 3) will come to exist in a way which is usable? I really doubt it, but let&#039;s see.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As far as being bought, Sabeer Bhatia knows his game pretty well. He has dealt with Microsoft before. If you read his account of the Hotmail sale, you&#039;ll see that he had it all planned out. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think he&#039;s taking the same approach. Going after the thing Microsoft lacks. The best way at the moment to get their attention would be to &#039;be&#039; in their face. Microsoft won&#039;t sue them unless they&#039;re confident about their &#039;own&#039; product.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This should be fun ;)&lt;span class=&quot;p_ref&quot;&gt;&lt;a title=&quot;Reference to this paragraph&quot; href=&quot;#p:0&quot;&gt;&#x2318;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="p:0">2010? That&#8217;s being &#8216;very&#8217; optimistic! You really think any of those five points (except for 1 and 3) will come to exist in a way which is usable? I really doubt it, but let&#8217;s see.&lt;br/>&lt;br/>As far as being bought, Sabeer Bhatia knows his game pretty well. He has dealt with Microsoft before. If you read his account of the Hotmail sale, you&#8217;ll see that he had it all planned out. &lt;br/>&lt;br/>I think he&#8217;s taking the same approach. Going after the thing Microsoft lacks. The best way at the moment to get their attention would be to &#8216;be&#8217; in their face. Microsoft won&#8217;t sue them unless they&#8217;re confident about their &#8216;own&#8217; product.&lt;br/>&lt;br/>This should be fun ;)<span class="p_ref"><a title="Reference to this paragraph" href="#p:0">&#x2318;</a></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avatar</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/the-whole-online-office-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/archives/117#comment-500</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i am very interested in the developments of the online Office suite so i have tried pretty much every single option.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in terms of features and use Zoho wins out easily, in terms of design and approach? i think Buzzword made in flex and recently bought by adobe does shows what and how Live documents could work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Google Docs is the weakest from the top 3 examples. i am really surprised that Google didn&#039;t bought Zoho already, but maybe the fact that they would have to pay a 10x valuation price of zoho (1-1.5billion) could be a deterrent when they already have invested over 3 billions developing the google docs suite the past 2 years along everything they have expended overall.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MS knows what they are doing, the office live marketplace. i remember the early concepts of what the live desk was going to be so i get an idea of where they are going with it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and they are working on sharedview/foldershare integrations for it and having it running on a sharepoint server, already give some food for thought.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I see Live Documents as a Frontal Offer to MS, they are doing too many &quot;in your Face&quot; things so Microsoft cannot ignore them and either decides sue them or buy them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think they got a good chance of getting bought, it is always a gamble.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;now on a online office actually working out? it will but not now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You need 5 factors for that happen:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;cheap powerful portable devices&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;cheap/free and fast global internet access&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;a great and easy to work with software tech evolved enough to do the job cross platform and cross medium&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;actual cloud computing&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Huge Data centers that can provide the unlimited bandwith and storage power&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We don&#039;t got any of those points covered in a global scale, so i think we will not start seeing it really work out until 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am very interested in the developments of the online Office suite so i have tried pretty much every single option.</p>

<p>in terms of features and use Zoho wins out easily, in terms of design and approach? i think Buzzword made in flex and recently bought by adobe does shows what and how Live documents could work.</p>

<p>Google Docs is the weakest from the top 3 examples. i am really surprised that Google didn&#8217;t bought Zoho already, but maybe the fact that they would have to pay a 10x valuation price of zoho (1-1.5billion) could be a deterrent when they already have invested over 3 billions developing the google docs suite the past 2 years along everything they have expended overall.</p>

<p>MS knows what they are doing, the office live marketplace. i remember the early concepts of what the live desk was going to be so i get an idea of where they are going with it.</p>

<p>and they are working on sharedview/foldershare integrations for it and having it running on a sharepoint server, already give some food for thought.</p>

<p>I see Live Documents as a Frontal Offer to MS, they are doing too many &#8220;in your Face&#8221; things so Microsoft cannot ignore them and either decides sue them or buy them.</p>

<p>I think they got a good chance of getting bought, it is always a gamble.</p>

<hr />

<p>now on a online office actually working out? it will but not now.</p>

<p>You need 5 factors for that happen:</p>

<p><ol><li>cheap powerful portable devices</li><li>cheap/free and fast global internet access</li><li>a great and easy to work with software tech evolved enough to do the job cross platform and cross medium</li><li>actual cloud computing</li><li>Huge Data centers that can provide the unlimited bandwith and storage power</li></ol></p>

<p>We don&#8217;t got any of those points covered in a global scale, so i think we will not start seeing it really work out until 2010.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
