<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After 2 Years, 77 Feeds Subscribed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/after-2-years-77-feeds-subscribed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/after-2-years-77-feeds-subscribed/</link>
	<description>Warning: Geek Inside!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:14:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/after-2-years-77-feeds-subscribed/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 10:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/?p=478#comment-713</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I made the decision to quit news reporting a long time ago, because I had ~200 feeds and most of them were mirrors (now down to 55; no news blogs except Techcrunch and Torrent Freak). I still frown when I see news posts by blogs that usually do informative tutorials (perhaps for SERPs).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And one thing to note: ads are not always click-based. During my two Digg successes, my ad revenue was a grant $0 because I put only an AdSense block at the end (hoping for some CPA ads). Having learned from the tragedy( ;) ), I used impression-based ads (Burst Media) during third last Digg success and got $200, which is not too shabby for the effort I put in (2 hours). But you&#039;re right about &#039;Page views don’t mean squat&#039; - even advertisers actively query feed subscription and returning visitors figures.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made the decision to quit news reporting a long time ago, because I had ~200 feeds and most of them were mirrors (now down to 55; no news blogs except Techcrunch and Torrent Freak). I still frown when I see news posts by blogs that usually do informative tutorials (perhaps for SERPs).</p>

<p>And one thing to note: ads are not always click-based. During my two Digg successes, my ad revenue was a grant $0 because I put only an AdSense block at the end (hoping for some CPA ads). Having learned from the tragedy( ;) ), I used impression-based ads (Burst Media) during third last Digg success and got $200, which is not too shabby for the effort I put in (2 hours). But you&#8217;re right about &#8216;Page views don’t mean squat&#8217; - even advertisers actively query feed subscription and returning visitors figures.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://journal.adityamukherjee.com/essay/after-2-years-77-feeds-subscribed/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adityamukherjee.com/geekaholic/?p=478#comment-709</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to toil through numerous entries every day, which tell the same thing. Essentially, I have a label called &quot;Tech News&quot; where I just browse through the titles of posts from the likes of Techcrunch, Engadget and Lifehacker! And the percentage of those which I bother reading is a mere 10-15%&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to toil through numerous entries every day, which tell the same thing. Essentially, I have a label called &#8220;Tech News&#8221; where I just browse through the titles of posts from the likes of Techcrunch, Engadget and Lifehacker! And the percentage of those which I bother reading is a mere 10-15%</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
